Saturday, December 05, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

MAIL FROM RUBBER STAMP RADANOVICH

I have the misfortune to live in the district "served" by Congressman George Radanovich, a reactionary Republican.

Today I got a mailing from Radanovich that was in high dudgeon about the federal deficit. Mr. Radanovich wasn't nearly as concerned about the deficit back in the days of "W" and the massive deficits he created with his transfers of wealth to the risk. Honesty is a hard quality for Republicans to come by.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


BUSH'S DAYS OF INFAMY

President Franklin D. Roosevelt famously called December 7, 1941, "a day that will live in infamy." But George W. Bush and his gang of criminal confederates contributed several days of infamy to our history.

The Supreme Court created the first day of infamy when they used twisted and fallacious reasoning to hand the presidency to Bush, who lost the popular vote, and who undoubtedly lost the vote in the pivotal state of Florida.

The second day of infamy was when Bush was sworn in as President. Bush stood there on that day and swore to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. He spent the next eight years doing exactly the opposite.

A third day of infamy was September 11, 2001, when, due to the Bush administration's abject incompetence, terrorists launched successful attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and on the Pentagon in Washington, D. C.

The fourth day of infamy was when an attack was launched on Iraq, a country that was no threat to us and had nothing to do with 9/11.

Robert Parry takes a look at the day Bush was sworn in as president and how the major media ignored the outrage felt by so many Americans. This excerpt is at www.consortiumnews.com:

But other Americans believed January 20, 2001, was a day of infamy for the American Republic. It was the first time in 112 years that a popular-vote loser was to be installed as President of the United States – and then only after he engineered an unprecedented intervention by political allies on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Five Republican justices had stopped the vote count in the swing state of Florida, where Bush’s brother, Jeb, was governor and other Bush loyalists oversaw the election, which then was awarded to Bush by 537 votes out of six million ballots cast.

So, on that cold January day, tens of thousands of protesters poured into the streets of Washington, D.C., shouting angry slogans and waving handwritten anti-Bush signs.

The protesters were convinced that Bush had stolen the presidential election and, in so doing, had disenfranchised the plurality of citizens who had cast their ballots for Democrat Al Gore.

Some signs were addressed directly to Bush. “You’re not my President,” read one. “I know you lost,” said another. One sign had just two large letters, “NO.” To these Americans, Bush’s ascension to the nation’s highest office was a travesty of democracy.

Where we stood, the protesters, many in dark-colored parkas and ski or baseball caps, outnumbered the elegantly attired Republicans.

Thursday, September 03, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

CONSERVATIVES ARE TERMINALLY STUPID

Sometimes when I read a letter in The Fresno Bee I have to wonder if it's tongue in cheek. But right-wingers are so stupid you usually just believe the letter is real.

Today's example was a guy on a rant about Nazis and socialism. His argument is that Nazis were called "National Socialists." Therefore, they have to be socialists. If you consult political scientists, the people who know about these things, you will find that Nazis were fascists. Fascists are on the far political right, as far removed from socialists as you can get.

Communist East Germany called itself the German Democratic Republic Because they used the word "Democratic" does that mean they were a democracy? Of course not.

We should remember that Germany attacked the Soviet Union, who this guy would probably call socialist. Conservatives have an incredible talent for jamming personal attacks, stupidity, ignorance, and outright lies into very limited space.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

THE WEIRD RIGHT WING WORLD

I'm watching the coverage of Senator Edward Kennedy's funeral and there is great sadness. The sadness is over the loss of Senator Kennedy, over the loss of JFK and RFK all those years ago, the loss of other great leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr. We don't have leaders of that caliber or that vision left. Edward Kennedy was the torch that still burned and now his life has been extinguished.

The Fresno Bee prints snippets of letters to give you an idea of the content. Lately, when I see the usual frothing of right-wing freaks I don't bother to read the rest. Today's sampling included the assertion that liberals think we have all the answers. No, we don't. If we did, the world would be far better than it is. The hateful right-wing philosophy of greed, exploitation, bigotry, war, and hate would be shoved to the back of the closet. But right-wing influence is everywhere in the media.

For right-wingers there is never enough prejudice, never enough inequality, never enough death and destruction. It's like a narcotic for them.

I hope that we not only have leaders like JFK, RFK, and Edward Kennedy, but that we collectively become like them. That is when things will truly change.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

THE RIGHT-WING ASSAULT ON ALL OF US

Maybe we need a new social science that combines aspects of political science, sociology, and psychology to analyze the behavior of the right wing in this country. It's a movement mostly moved by hate and paranoia. It's all emotion and no reason. Most of the knuckle draggers who fulminate against things like "socialized medicine" have no idea of what they're talking about. They've heard the talking points from the thugs who manipulate them, people like Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Gingrich, and Palin. They repeat those talking points endlessly. They talk about "freedom" while they busily go about denying freedom to their fellow citizens by threat and intimidation.

If we don't get national health care, it will be a national tragedy. We should have had national health care decades ago. But just as the vestiges of slavery endured for one hundred years after the Civil War--and still endures in many ways--we continue with the same broken and heartless system. Other countries have successfully implemented health care for their citizens but we, the "can do" country, can't do it because of the cruel and selfish ideologues on the political right. This editorial from The New York Times summarizes it well from www.nytimes.com:

If nothing is done to slow current trends, the number of people in this country without insurance or with inadequate coverage will continue to spiral upward. That would be a personal tragedy for many and a moral disgrace for the nation. It is also by no means cost-free. Any nation as rich as ours ought to guarantee health coverage for all of its residents.


Sunday, August 16, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

RIGHT WING WRECKAGE

It's ironic when you think about it. The traditional idea of conservatism is to conserve, to be cautious. What gets called "conservative" now is about destruction: destruction of the economy, destruction of the environment, destruction of civil liberties. It comes straight out of Orwell's 1984. The people who shout "freedom" are the destroyers of freedom.

Shakespeare described conservatives well when he wrote in A Midsummer's Night Dream: "The jaws of darkness do devour it up: So quick bright things come to confusion."

My prevailing mood these days is weariness. I have a job I absolutely loathe and can't leave because of the economic disaster left by the Bush administration. Hopes for universal health care, which this country desperately needs, appear to be dimming. The war in Afghanistan is actually escalating. News on the environmental front is constantly depressing. It seems the human race is determined to destroy our own planet. The "jaws of darkness" do indeed "devour it up."


Sunday, August 02, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

REVERSE MIGRATION

A good friend is moving from California back to Texas this weekend. After years of working at a miserable job that we both hate, she has had enough. She and her husband are going back to Houston. Right-wingers always make it sound so simple. If you don't like your job, whatever, just quit. The problem is you need to find some income somewhere. The jobs aren't here now. Fresno has a miserable economy even in good national economic times. Thanks to Bush at the national level and a series of right-wing policies in this state, the economy lies in shambles. The Golden State has turned into lead.

This commentary by Marc Cooper is at www.thenation.com:

Aggravating matters, Governor Schwarzenegger took an intractable "no new taxes" position and then went a step further, saying the crisis was an opportunity to make "structural reforms." Translation: the governor demanded radical shrinkage of the public sector, including virtual abolition of CalWorks, the state welfare program, and a rollback of state employee pensions. He even threatened the "nuclear option": suspension of Prop 98, which requires that 40 percent of state revenues be channeled into schools. Four years ago, when Schwarzenegger attempted to impose a similar far-reaching conservative agenda through a set of referendums, he was mightily slapped down by voters and forced to apologize. Now, it seemed, he was trying to hold the state hostage to these draconian changes as the price of a budget deal. "He just got it in his head that his time is up and his legacy must be long-term reform," said Bebitch Jeffe. "So he's using the short-term budget as leverage. Either he doesn't understand, or he's taking a mammoth risk."

"Some of the cuts proposed by the governor are unimaginable," said Barbara O'Connor, political analyst at Cal State, Sacramento, a few days before the budget deal was reached. "In the end," she predicted, "it will be declared a win-win. No one will love it. Everyone will accept it."

Maybe. Because in the end, while Schwarzenegger was proposing Armageddon, the Democrats settled for mere catastrophe. When the budget details were unveiled, it was like viewing the emaciated corpse of a once great state. There are no new taxes. But hammer blows hit the poor, the elderly, the infirm and students and will keep them staggering for years. The deal called for almost $8 billion to be taken from education; more than $1 billion from state worker pay; an equal amount from Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program; $375 million from CalWorks; $226 million from home healthcare, in which patients and caregivers will now have to be fingerprinted; $124 million from Healthy Families health insurance, which means thousands of children will be wait-listed for coverage; and more than $4 billion confiscated from local governments, which will create a ripple effect of collateral damage. The proposed taxes on oil extraction, tobacco sales and vehicle registration were penciled out; the budget was balanced only through a set of accounting gimmicks, which merely kicked the crisis down the road a few months. The only winners in this deal were felons, who won a $1.2 billion cut in prison funding, which would reduce the prison population by some 27,000.

Saturday, July 04, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

GO AWAY, PALIN, GO AWAY

Sarah Palin, last year's GOP vice-presidential candidate and current Alaska governor, announced she will step down as governor. She did not disclose her future plans. There is speculation she will pursue the GOP presidential nomination in 2012. There is other speculation that a myriad of ethics complaints prompted her resignation, and that possible more scandals are to come. In any event, I hope Palin just goes far, far away. Right-wing extremists like Palin have left ruin their wake. You only wish that our version of "governor" in California would also step down. His ineptitude, which has reached epic proportions, has left the state in a miserable condition. This commentary by Gail Collins is at www.nytimes.com:


Last year's GOP vice-presidential candidate, Alaska governor Sarah Palin, Sarah Barracuda made her big announcement Friday afternoon on the lawn of her home to an audience that appeared to include only Todd, the kids and the next-door neighbors. Smiling manically, she looked like a parody of the woman who knocked the Republicans dead at their convention. She babbled about her parents’ refrigerator magnet, which apparently had a lot of wise advice. And she recalled her visit with the troops in Kosovo, whose dedication and determination inspired her to ... resign.

“Life is about choices!” declared the nation’s most anti-choice politician.

People, what is going on with governors in this country? Are we doomed to see them go bonkers one by one, state by state? announced her resignation. There is speculation Palin will make a run for the presidency in 2012. There is other speculation that a myriad of ethics scandals, with possible more scandals to come, caused her to step down. In any event, I hope Palin just goes far, far away. I don't think she would be a good candidate for president, but I'm just tired of right-wing extremists and Palin is about as extremist as they come. I wish our version of governor here in California would step down. His ineptitude has reached epic proportions and the damage he has done to the state will take a very long time to repair. This commentary by
Gail Collins is at www.nytimes.com:

Sunday, June 14, 2009


HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

RIGHT WING: NOTHING BUT HATE

Right-wing philosophy is a cancer on this country. Right-wingers have impeded social progress at every turn. They tried to derail the New Deal and positive reforms such as Social Security, unemployment insurance, banking regulation, and a basic safety net for the majority of us. They fought tooth and nail against civil rights legislation. They have blocked attempts at regulating gun ownership and we see the carnage constantly from any nut getting easy access to a gun to kill lots and lots of people. They cling to a superstitious religious belief that should have gone the way of bleeding with leeches. In this column Tim Rutten looks at the wave of hate crimes committed by right-wing cretins The column is at www.latimes.com:

The United States' extreme right wing inhabits a shadow world, and the delusional nature of its core beliefs -- anti-Semitism, white supremacy and a rat's nest of economic and constitutional conspiracy theories -- makes tracing causality within its ranks a dicey proposition. Still, it's clear that something is stirring this peculiarly American cesspool in ways that haven't occurred since the mid-1990s, when an upsurge in activity among so-called militia groups culminated in the 1995 bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City, the deadliest terrorist incident on American soil until 9/11.

Rumors that the new Obama administration secretly planned to seize people's firearms surged through the Internet, which nowadays links extremists like a kind of fevered nervous system, and fueled a run on gun stores that stock assault weapons. In April, incidents of violence began to crop up: Three Pittsburgh police officers were killed by a 23-year-old man who feared his guns were about to be seized. The alleged killer frequented white-supremacist websites and frequently railed to his friends about "Jewish control" of the banks and media. Shortly afterward, a Florida National Guard soldier shot two deputy sheriffs to death, allegedly because he was "severely disturbed" by Obama's election. He too was a frequent reader of far-right-wing websites.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

DARTH CHENEY AND THE POLITICS OF FEAR

Darth Cheney emerged from his crypt and, amazingly, didn't burst into flame when exposed to sunlight. Cheney wants to give us a revised history of the deplorable Bush administration and he wants to defend the policies he and Bush inflicted on the country and the world. The media have become mostly stenographers, repeating whatever powerful politicians say, but without any analysis or background. So we don't hear torture called torture, but "enhanced interrogation" techniques. We're told the Bush administration kept us safe, but it was their dereliction of duty that allowed 9/11 to occur in the first place. And attacks have continued around the world. The unnecessary and immoral war in Iraq has drained our resources, cost innocent lives, and magnified the terrorist threat by making us more hated around the world. Frank Rich talks about Darth Cheney and gasbags like Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh in this column linked at www.commondreams.org:

Cheney's "no middle ground" speech on torture at the American Enterprise Institute arrived with the kind of orchestrated media campaign that he, his boss and Karl Rove patented in the good old days. It was bookended by a pair of Republican attack ads on the Web that crosscut President Obama's planned closure of the Guantánamo Bay detention center with apocalyptic imagery - graphic video of the burning twin towers in one ad, a roar of nuclear holocaust (borrowed from the L.B.J. "daisy" ad of 1964) in the other.

The speech itself, with 20 mentions of 9/11, struck the same cynical note as the ads, as if the G.O.P. was almost rooting for a terrorist attack on Obama's watch. "No one wishes the current administration more success in defending the country than we do," Cheney said as a disingenuous disclaimer before going on to charge that Obama's "half measures" were leaving Americans "half exposed." The new president, he said, is unraveling "the very policies that kept our people safe since 9/11." In other words, when the next attack comes, it will be all Obama's fault. A new ad shouting "We told you so!" awaits only the updated video.

The Republicans at least have an excuse for pushing this poison. They are desperate. The trio of Pillsbury doughboys now leading the party - Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, Cheney - have variously cemented the G.O.P.'s brand as a whites-only men's club by revoking Colin Powell's membership and smearing the first Latina Supreme Court nominee as a "reverse racist." Republicans in Congress have no plausible economic, health care or energy policies to counter Obama's. The only card left to play is 9/11.

Monday, May 25, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

CALIFORNIA: STATE OF CONTRADICTIONS

My family moved to California in the 1960's and back then California truly was the Golden State. We had wonderful infrastructure, a great economy, and good schools. That was in the era of Governor Pat Brown. Since then, we've had a number of bad Republican governors starting with Ronald Reagan on up to Arnold Schwarzenegger. We had the passage of Proposition 13, a right-wing initiative that has made it almost impossible to do anything fiscally responsible. The right-wing Republican minority is able to block almost anything it wants to block. So much for democracy.

California is where we have liberal San Francisco and the push for gay rights. It's also the home of the John Birch Society. California had the hippies in the 1960's, but Sacramento is where Rush Limbaugh got his start. California, derided by gasbags like Limbaugh as the "Left Coast," sent right-wingers like Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan to the White House. California, a leader in high tech industries, has also depended heavily on poor farm workers, often illegal immigrants, to maintain the agricultural industry In this column Paul Krugman talks about the horror of the federal government copying California in letting reactionary minorities derail meaningful change. The column is at www.nytimes.com:

What’s really alarming about California, however, is the political system’s inability to rise to the occasion.

Despite the economic slump, despite irresponsible policies that have doubled the state’s debt burden since Arnold Schwarzenegger became governor, California has immense human and financial resources. It should not be in fiscal crisis; it should not be on the verge of cutting essential public services and denying health coverage to almost a million children. But it is — and you have to wonder if California’s political paralysis foreshadows the future of the nation as a whole.

The seeds of California’s current crisis were planted more than 30 years ago, when voters overwhelmingly passed Proposition 13, a ballot measure that placed the state’s budget in a straitjacket. Property tax rates were capped, and homeowners were shielded from increases in their tax assessments even as the value of their homes rose.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


GOP'S DISTRACTIONS ON TORTURE


The method magicians use to perform their tricks is to distract. You focus on something the magician wants you to focus on so he can create his illusion. And so it is with the right wing's distractions on torture. From what you hear in the media, you would think Nancy Pelosi orchestrated this entire reprehensible program. If Nancy Pelosi knew about torture and did nothing to stop it, that is disgusting. But the people who conceived using torture and put torture into operation are far more disgusting and far more legally liable. This commentary by Gregg Levine is at www.firedoglake.com:


Because before you get to Pelosi, or to Graham, or Jane Harman, or a host of other congressional leaders who in good time should be held accountable for their action or inaction during the Bush years—before you get to any of that—one thing had to happen. . . .

Someone had to order the torture. Someone had to sign off on the program in its design phase, someone had to render a group of detainees, hold them outside the reach of US law, and someone had to give the order to have them tortured.

I could, at this point, throw out the name George W. Bush—he was president at the time, after all—but we now have pretty good evidence that the real authority for waterboarding (to name but the most talked about of many illegally brutal “techniques”), the real orders to “do that,” and “do that again,” came from the vice president. The order to torture came from Dick Cheney.

Let me say that again: Dick Cheney ordered torture.

Not Nancy Pelosi; Dick Cheney.

Before there were any briefings of any Democrats, there was the torture—a violation in-and-of itself—and that torture was ordered by Republican Vice President Dick Cheney.

And to take it one step further, that torture wasn’t ordered up to save us from some imagined “ticking bomb” scenario (not that torture would even solve that particular problem, and not that, even if it did, it could be justified), it was ordered to make detainees produce a specific, desired piece of information (or disinformation). Dick Cheney wanted a connection between the attacks of September 11, 2001 and Iraqi leader Sadam Hussein, and so Cheney told interrogators contractors to torture detainees until they stated that there was a link between al-Qaeda and Iraq.

Saturday, May 02, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


GOP: DISGUSTING AND OUT OF TOUCH

Right-wingers like to talk about "principles." Using the words "principle" and "Republican" in the same sentence is enough to make you gag. Now Republicans are suddenly deficit hawks, although they gave George W. Bush free reign to bankrupt the country. People who brayed about the "rule of law" during the Clinton administration had no problem with the Bush administration consistently breaking the law by authorizing the repugnant torture of detainees in the "War on Terror." People who are supposedly "strict constructionists" on the Constitution supported a guy who called the Constitution "a goddamned piece of paper" as he illegally spied on Americans and deprived people of their rights. Their economic policies would be a total joke if not for the absolute disaster they've created. This column by Bob Herbert is at www.nytimes.com:

The incredibly clueless stewards of the incredibly shrinking Republican Party would do well to recall that it was supposedly Abe Lincoln, a Republican, who said you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.

Not only has the G.O.P. spent years trying to fool everybody in sight with its phony-baloney, dime-store philosophies, it’s now trapped in the patently pathetic phase of fooling itself.

The economy has imploded, the auto industry is in danger of being vaporized and more than half of all working Americans are worried that they may lose their jobs in the next year. So what’s the Republican response? To build a wall of obstruction in front of efforts to get the economy moving again, and then to stand in front of that wall chanting gibberish about smaller government, lower taxes, spending cuts and Ronald Reagan.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


THE TORTURE-IRAQ CONNECTION

Release of the Bush administration's memos justifying "enhanced interrogation" techniques such as waterboarding has provoked considerable chatter among the pundit and political class. Right-wingers make the astonishing claim that releasing the memos has endangered U. S. national security. We hear the argument that it would be just a terrible precedent to prosecute officials from previous administrations for acting in "good faith" to protect the country. What they're saying is that criminals, if they're high enough in the government, should get a free pass.

Torture is contrary to everything we're supposed to represent. When we torture it takes away any credibility we have in arguing for human rights in repressive regimes around the world. It means that our enemies can torture and we really can't say much about it. The fact that torture does not elicit reliable information is another point, but certainly not the most important argument. In this commentary Frank Rich points out that the Bush administration was far less interested in protecting the country than in finding some justification for their filthy war in Iraq. The column is at www.nytimes.com:

Last week Bush-Cheney defenders, true to form, dismissed the Senate Armed Services Committee report as “partisan.” But as the committee chairman, Carl Levin, told me, the report received unanimous support from its members — John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman included.

Levin also emphasized the report’s accounts of military lawyers who dissented from White House doctrine — only to be disregarded. The Bush administration was “driven,” Levin said. By what? “They’d say it was to get more information. But they were desperate to find a link between Al Qaeda and Iraq.”

Five years after the Abu Ghraib revelations, we must acknowledge that our government methodically authorized torture and lied about it. But we also must contemplate the possibility that it did so not just out of a sincere, if criminally misguided, desire to “protect” us but also to promote an unnecessary and catastrophic war. Instead of saving us from “another 9/11,” torture was a tool in the campaign to falsify and exploit 9/11 so that fearful Americans would be bamboozled into a mission that had nothing to do with Al Qaeda. The lying about Iraq remains the original sin from which flows much of the Bush White House’s illegality.

Monday, April 13, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

CALIFORNIA'S ANTI-WORKER EDD

Think you have a social safety net if you lose your job in California? It's not necessarily so. Even if you should easily qualify for unemployment benefits, it becomes an onerous process to get the benefits. California's Employment Development Department in recent years has become decidedly anti-worker.

For instance, say that you begin some kind of job training. That can disqualify you for unemployment benefits. If you sign on the wrong line and say that you are starting training, you have to stay home for an "interview" by someone from EDD.

Even initial filing can be be a miserable process. If you try to call on the phone, you will most likely get a recorded message stating that EDD is too busy. They then summarily hang up on you.

If you weren't laid off, but lost your job for some other reason, you have to stay home for an "interview." They can find a myriad number of reasons to "interview" you these days, it seems, to try to disqualify you from unemployment.

It's not that unemployment is much of a safety net anyway. Most people would have a very difficult time surviving on unemployment for very long. I know the right-wing argument is that people have to get "incentives" to work, but what if there are no jobs?

Another thing that really irritates me about EDD is that they plaster your full Social Security number on forms. In an age where identity theft is a major problem, and Social Security numbers are a major part of identity theft, that seems highly irresponsible.

It's also mystifying that in age of the Internet that you can't file "continuing claim" forms online. You have to deal with a paper form (assuming they aren't holding that for an "interview.") You can file taxes online, pay bills online, renew your car registration online, so why can't you file continuing unemployment claims online?

Once we get rid of our current incompetent Republican governor I hope that EDD will undergo some reforms to make it sensitive to the needs of the unemployed.



Sunday, April 05, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


WORKER SOLIDARITY

Merle Haggard recorded a song called "The Workin' Man Can't Get Nowhere Today," and that's truer now than when Hag recorded it. With right wing dominance in the political and corporate culture there has been an assault on working people since Ronald Reagan strode into the White House in 1981. While the rich and their lackeys have done very well, wages and benefits for working people have stagnated or actually declined. Now, after the corrupt and incompetent administration of George W. Bush, we see the bitter fruits of right wing policies in their full hideous display.

Martin Luther King was killed 41 years ago. Martin Luther King was in Memphis, Tennessee, to lend support to striking sanitation workers. We can acknowledge and support Doctor King's legacy by standing up for working people once again. This commentary by Robyn E. Blumner is at www.commondreams.org:

One of the great labor speeches in American history is King's 1961 address to the AFL-CIO. In it King reflected on the grand work of the labor movement. He said that in response to the "organized misery" of sweatshops and the notion that capital may "act without restraints and without conscience," the worker unionized and by doing so had "constructed the means by which a fairer sharing of the fruits of his toil had to be given to him."

How sad that in the intervening years King's message to workers has been lost. Worker solidarity has given way to an every-man-for-himself ethic that has helped to strip labor of the influence it once had.

No surprise then that America's prosperity over the last 30 years has not been shared with the workers who created it, with essentially all of its rewards flowing to those at the top. Workers are no longer at the table when the pie gets divided, so they get the crumbs.

It seems the American worker has just been waiting around for, as King put it, "charitable impulses to grow in his employer."

Well, they haven't.

Saturday, April 04, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


SICK OF WINGNUTS


The wingnuts who write letters to the editor of The Fresno Bee are putting their ignorance, bigotry, and callousness on full display since Barack Obama became president. There's nothing new, of course. It's the same old tripe about "socialism" or other paranoid delusions. Today we had a repeat of the McCain campaign meme mocking Obama as "the anointed one." That's a little odd when many on the right claimed that George W. Bush was installed by God. I don't remember any pronouncements from the Deity, but maybe I just missed it.

Fresno is such a hole anyway. We have incredibly high poverty and incredibly high social dysfunction. A part of that, I'm convinced, is because we have more wingnuts per capita than almost any other place in the country. It's time for these right-wing cretins to crawl under their rocks and molder away.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

STORY OF AN INSPECTION COMPANY


Some names have been changed in this account.



"Abandon hope all you who enter here." Dante


1. SOME BACKGROUND


Anonymous Inspections is an insurance property inspections company located in Fresno, California. Anonymous is right across the street from a church. A major shopping mall is up the street. The area is the frequent target of graffiti vandals and homeless people sleep outside the buildings at night.

I spent almost seven years making my way into the Anonymous parking lot and parking under the big trees at the back of the parking lot. I especially liked the trees in the summer because I took my breaks and lunch in my car. The trees made it a little cooler. It was a brief haven from the office.

The building itself is a rather dingy affair with stained carpets and leaky ceilings. The manager's office is surrounded by glass and reminds me of an aquarium without the water. There is another office located behind the manager's office that contains the computer server in a small room and a larger room where the IT staff sits.

The break room at the front of the building contains cheap plastic chairs, a refrigerator (with frequent complaints about the dirty refrigerator), tables, a microwave oven, and a time clock. There is a sign over the sink ordering people to wash their dishes (which gets ignored much of the time). On the other side is the "training room" and in front of the training room is another office where the payroll clerk works.

The biggest room holds the reviewing staff . The area is divided into cubicles where reviewers sit hunched over their keyboards peering at computer monitors displaying photos of lifting roofs, peeling paint, cracked sidewalks, and other conditions that insurance companies consider problems.

I spent most of my time in Anonymous in a cubicle trying to desperately keep up my "numbers" and avoid any major mistakes on inspection reports.


2. THE OWNER


On its website Anonymous proudly calls itself a family owned business. You have this image of a Mom and Pop place that is something like Garrison Keillor's Lake Woebegone. The reality is closer to the Corleone family in The Godfather.

Anonymous's principal owner is the Matriarch (a. k. a. The Mother). I saw The Matriarch just a handful of times in my seven years. She would come around at Christmas and, to my surprise, even gave us small Christmas bonuses a few times. She would bring her dogs into the office, pushing them in baby strollers.

She drove a Jaguar and we got to see pictures of her big houses at Bass Lake and on the coast.

Her own grandson once allegedly told her of the misery felt by her employees. He said Anonymous's employees were trapped and underpaid. She reportedly responded that Anonymous's employees were overpaid at $9.00 or $10.00 an hour.

For the most part, The Matriarch was content to collect big checks and leave the actual management of the company to family members.


3. HOLY MANAGEMENT CHANGE, BATMAN!


The Matriarch's two sons managed the company until just after Thanksgiving, 2007. They abruptly resigned and we heard innuendos of unethical conduct.

The Matriarch brought in the management team of The Christian and The Optimist, who had moved down from northern California. The Christian is The Matriarch's daughter. We were told that The Optimist had a background in banking and that The Christian had previously run an inspection company.

The first few weeks we got a public relations campaign. Even The Matriarch made appearances in the office. The Christian would come around and greet us in the morning. We were offered gift cards as incentives for more productivity. I even won a few.

As the year wore on, though, things changed. There were no more visits to ask us how we were. There were no more gift cards. We were mandated a stricter dress code, even though we rarely had public contact. Even when the air conditioning made it as icy as the tundra, we couldn't wear jackets that weren't part of the dress code.

We were instructed to send a daily email that detailed our day. We were supposed to find something positive to talk about.

We got word from the IT guy that he monitored the websites we visited. He took great offense that some people had visited sites like My Space or Face Book. We also learned that management read our emails.

The Christian and The Optimist team decided they wanted to move into commercial inspections and I was a candidate to "review" those reports. I had some slight interest at first. But when they started talking about out-of-town trips I wasn't as enthused. I have a hard time physically riding in a car for several hours. The Optimist, in particular, seemed perturbed that I couldn't make long road trips.

A friend was interested in learning commercial reports because she thought the knowledge would give her a leg up on becoming an insurance underwriter. But she suddenly had reports dumped on her without any real training. The Christian reportedly didn't like my friend's criticisms of the often shabby work by field inspectors.


4. MICROMANAGEMENT


The more I was exposed to reviewing the more I became convinced that the greatest qualification is the self discipline not to take an automatic weapon to work.

A perfect report has the photos the insurance company wants arranged in the correct order (front, rear, left side, right side, all around the town), a diagram that looks like the home, square footage that coincides with the tax report information, and notes from the inspector about any problems or questions the insurance company might have. Perfect reports happen about as often as blizzards in Fresno in July.

Inspectors have an uncanny ability to ignore written instructions. For example, suppose there is a written instruction that photos of all outbuildings are required. You can bet that the inspector will say there are outbuildings, but not send any photos. Sometimes getting what you need from an inspector is a little like greyhounds at a dog track chasing a mechanical rabbit round and round and round.

Under the The Christian-Optimist regime there were rules. And more rules. We were told we had to contact the inspectors by email and by phone and by cell phone. They apparently didn't think about smoke signals, jungle drums, or homing pigeons. We had to document our contacts in the "Activity Log." We had to document our contacts on a separate list that we sent them every day. After a while, it felt like I was documenting my documenting.

We were given big binders that contained the guidelines for every account. We were told that we had to keep the binders open at all times. I don't know; maybe we were supposed to learn the guidelines by osmosis.

The word "diagram" has taken on a negative connotation for me now. It's the single biggest headache in the reviewing process.

The Christian-Optimist regime decided it would be a nifty idea to include camera icons on the diagram. The idea is show the angle from where a photo is taken. I should explain that diagrams are already an enormous headache. Inspectors leave off porches, decks, second levels, outbuildings, balconies, bay windows, etc. on diagrams. The objective, from the reviewing standpoint, is to have the diagram look like the house in the photos and to match the desired square footage. Camera icons were just one more monkey wrench in the process.

Camera icons took on a surrealistic aspect when were told we had to include camera icons for condition photos. Say, for example, an inspector takes a photo of peeling paint on the siding. Unless you're psychic, you don't have clue where that damage is unless the inspector tells you. What do you think the odds are that the inspector will tell you?


5. NUMBERS


In this context we're not talking about Arabic numerals or Roman numerals or a television show on CBS on Friday night. Management was very big on "numbers," which equates to the number of reports you complete every day. You track every second of your day so that you can arrive at an hourly average. When you got really bad reports (which is frequent), or you had really complicated reports, your "numbers" would go in the tank.

This was important because "numbers" were the basis for your raise, such as it was. So it was the classic case of a double bind. You had to have error free reports and you had to produce "numbers." Trying to do both was a little like doing jumping jacks on a high wire. I sometimes thought that we should get a handicap like golfers get. If you got reports from some inspectors, you would automatically qualify for a handicap.

Photos, or lack of photos, were a big obstacle in achieving "numbers." If you got reports without photos, or if you got photos that were almost unusable because they were too dark or too light or taken at a weird angle, that greatly affected your "numbers." We would either spend time trying to get photos (documenting in the Activity Log as explained above), fix photos, or get someone else to fix the photos (documenting in the Activity Log as explained above).

"Numbers" became especially important around billing time. We would get emails telling us that we had posted "X" number of reports up to that point. It was supposed to motivate us.


6. HOW TO CO-OPT


The Christian and The Optimist suggested once that I could be a supervisor. I said I wasn't interested. I've been a supervisor. I consider it a no-win position. You can't please management and you can't please the people you supervise. You frequently get put on salary, which means you don't even get paid overtime. And overtime was very important in the The Christian-Optimist regime.

I wasn't a big fan of overtime at Anonymous. It's reminds me of a scene from the movie The Little Shoppe of Horrors. A guy is having his tooth drilled by a dentist. He doesn't use Novocain. He enjoys pain and tells the dentist "My God! Don't stop now!" Unlike that man, I don't enjoy pain. Reviewing for 40 hours was enough pain (see above regarding Activity Log, inspectors, diagrams).

Team Christian-Optimist tried another innovation. They designated people as "account managers." An account manager was in charge of a specific account or accounts and would usually have two or three members of a "team" ( we didn't get pennants or cheerleaders, unfortunately) assigned to work on that account. As things evolved, the chief function of the account managers was to harass members of their "team."

One of the classic strategies of warfare is to divide and conquer. In the business world that concept frequently means management co-opting employees. You get them to identify with management rather than with their coworkers.

I would have a typical report with problems, go through the process of contacting the inspector, and then document it (see documenting in the Activity Log above). In a flash I would get emails from the account manager wanting me to follow up. Or I would get an email claiming that a question I had wasn't really a problem at all (I was just too stupid, I guess).

After a series of condescending emails from one specific account manager, I'd had enough. I emailed her that I was tired of the nasty emails.

The Christian thought that was "disrespectful" and--poof!-- I was suddenly out of a job.


7. RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK


The Christian is religious, or claims to be religious. You half expected there to be a bright heavenly glow from the aquarium-like office, or perhaps a chorus of angels. An altar for blood sacrifice would be apropos.

I'm tolerant of religious belief, although admittedly skeptical. I've done the religion thing and the more I examined things the less I believed. But I don't think religion mixes with business any better than it mixes with politics.

It's especially disturbing when religion is used as a hammer. Its punitive and vindictive side comes out instead of the compassionate side exemplified by The Golden Rule. I have the feeling that The Christian knows more about the punitive side of religious belief than about the compassionate side.

It was a little like the climatic scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark. The Nazis believe they have found the ultimate weapon in the Ark. But when they open it all kinds of monstrous creatures rush out. People are being killed and faces are melting. You had to walk softly when you walked by The Christian's office.


8. QUIET DESPERATION


Henry David Thoreau wrote, "The mass of men live lives of quiet desperation." Thoreau could have been a reviewer at Anonymous Inspections.

When you talk about how much you hate a job some enterprising sort will ask, "Then why don't you just leave?" It should be so simple.

In our system jobs are a little like musical chairs. When the music stops people scramble for the chairs and someone is always left out. You need some things, like money for rent, or health insurance, so you grit your teeth and try to slog through another day or week.

I've spent a few decades now going to jobs I hate because it's the lesser of two evils. It's go to a job I hate or starve.

Many of us spend our lives in quiet desperation, not getting the opportunity to fulfill our dreams or potential. We spend our lives on the treadmill of working paycheck to paycheck for too little money and no appreciation, hoping for that little annual raise, and that someway somehow there is a way out. But it's a system that rewards the few at the expense of the many with reminders of how “lucky” we are to have jobs. Some luck.



Saturday, March 21, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


REAGAN: SOCIALIST FOR THE RICH


From its inception the United States has had inequality. The well-to-do find rationalizations for why they deserve everything and no one else deserves anything. I've been reading a little of Arthur Schlesinger's book The Age of Jackson. Back in the 1830's the debate raged about inequality. Amos Kendall, a supporter of President Jackson, observed: "In all civilized as well as barbarous countries a few rich and intelligent men have built up nobility systems; by which, under some name, and by some contrivance, the few are enabled to live upon the labor of the many." In 1980 Ronald Reagan was elected. He was a great believer in "nobility systems" and orchestrated a massive transfer of wealth from the middle and working class to the very rich. This commentary by Ravi Batra is at www.truthout.org:

Let's go back to the early 1980's. In 1981, Reagan signed a law that sharply reduced the income tax for the wealthiest Americans and corporations. The president asserted his program would create jobs, purge inflation and, get this, trim the budget deficit. However, following the tax cut, the deficit soared from 2.5 percent of GDP to over 6 percent, alarming financial markets, sending interest rates sky high, and culminating in the worst recession since the 1930's.

Soon the president realized he needed new revenues to trim the deficit, bring down interest rates and improve his chances for reelection. He would not rescind the income tax cut, but other taxes were acceptable. In 1982, taxes were raised on gasoline and cigarettes, but the deficit hardly budged. In 1983, the president signed the biggest tax rise on payrolls, promising to create a surplus in the Social Security system, while knowing all along that the new revenue would be used to finance the deficit.

The retirement system was looted from the first day the Social Security surplus came into being, because the legislation itself gave the president a free hand to spend the surplus in any way he liked. Thus began a massive transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class, especially the self-employed small businessman, to the wealthy. The self-employment tax jumped as much as 66 percent.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

THE RICH AREN'T SO DIFFERENT AFTER ALL

In right wing land we're told that the rich are special. They're the "achievers," the risk takers, the innovators, the virtuous, and deserving of so much more than the rest of us. I've never bought that idea. I worked for a company for seven years where the owner didn't work, but collected handsome checks from the blood,sweat, and tears of her employees. A good deal of wealth in this country is inherited. A lot of it comes from financial manipulation such as we've seen with AIG. This commentary by Michael Hiltzik is at www.latimes.com:

That the point is even open for discussion suggests that a sea change is taking place on the American political scene. For decades, the wealthy have been held up as people to be admired, victors in the Darwinian economic struggle by virtue of their personal ingenuity and hard work.

Americans consistently supported fiscal policies that undermined middle- and working-class interests partially because they saw themselves as rich-people-in-waiting: Given time, toil and the magic of compound interest, anyone could retire a millionaire.

That mind-set has all but been eradicated by the damage sustained by the average worker's nest egg, combined with the spectacle of bankers and financial engineers maintaining their lifestyles with multimillion-dollar bonuses while the submerged 99% struggle for oxygen.

(The price of admission to the top 1% income-earning club last year was roughly $400,000.) That may account for the near-total absence of public outcry over President Obama's proposal to raise tax rates on the wealthiest Americans -- except of course from the wealthiest Americans.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


BYE BYE RIGHT WING HATE RADIO

A lady wrote a letter to The Fresno Bee criticizing right wing gasbags Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. The Bee has a comments section for people to respond to letters and, of course, the Ditto Head community was represented. One response said something about "the left," assuming that the writer was on the left. Criticizing the tactics and misinformation of Limbaugh and Hannity automatically puts you on the left? Who knew? Rush Limbaugh could claim that he parted the Red Sea and the Ditto Heads would rush to his defense because they're morons. The good news is that right wing hate radio is declining in California. They had they heyday and we see the catastrophe that has resulted. This article by Michael Finnegan is at www.latimes.com:

Tune in to conservative talk radio in California, and the insults quickly fly. Capturing the angry mood of listeners the other day, a popular host in Los Angeles called Republican lawmakers who voted to raise state taxes "a bunch of weak slobs."

With their trademark ferocity, radio stars who helped engineer Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's rise in the 2003 recall have turned on him over the new tax increases. On stations up and down the state, they are chattering away in hopes of igniting a taxpayers' revolt to kill his budget measures on the May 19 ballot.

But for all the anti-tax swagger and the occasional stunts by personalities like KFI's John and Ken, the reality is that conservative talk radio in California is on the wane. The economy's downturn has depressed ad revenue at stations across the state, thinning the ranks of conservative broadcasters.

For that and other reasons, stations have dropped the shows of at least half a dozen radio personalities and scaled back others, in some cases replacing them with cheaper nationally syndicated programs.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


BUSINESS AND EMPLOYEES: A ONE-SIDED RELATIONSHIP

I lost a job I'd had for almost seven years on February 11. I had an email exchange with an abusive supervisor and the office manager considered my response to be "disrespectful." I suspect it was all a pretext because the company is having major financial problems, I'm over 40, and voila! You cut people who are past 40 because their health insurance costs more. You bring in some part-timer with no benefits. So I identify with this article by Dave Lindorff at www.smirkingchimp.com:

Welcome to the American business world.

It is, for the most part, an ugly, heartless place where loyalty is rewarded with abuse and relationships are intensely hierarchical, one-sided and ultimately totally artificial. It is a place where managers do not have to follow the basic rules of human decency by which they for the most part live in their private lives.

Across the country, every day, some 20,000 or more American workers are getting sacked these days by managers who are focused on bottom lines and satisfying greedy investors. A shockingly high percentage of these victims of recession and corporate greed get little or no notice. One reason for this shabby and abusive treatment is that companies don't want word leaking out about their difficulties and their cutbacks. Bad news about layoffs can hurt stock prices, can alarm customers and can worry creditors.

Many employers even attempt to block fired employees from collecting unemployment compensation (an employer's unemployment insurance rate is determined by experience--the greater the number of workers you fire who go on unemployment, the higher your premium). They do this by claiming the worker was fired "for cause." This forces the sacked worker to appeal and go through a hearing process, all of which can take weeks, with the outcome uncertain.

Monday, March 09, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


GETTING OLDER IS A SIN IN CAPITALIST SOCIETY


I'm going through my third layoff in this decade. I suspect a large part of it is that I'm over 40. Once you hit 40 in this society you have a target on your back. It's hard to get hired and if the economy turns sour you're immediately a target for a layoff. Businesses can always rationalize job cuts so that don't openly admit they're discriminating by age, but the large number of Baby Boomers getting laid off isn't just coincidental. This is yet another argument for a national health care system. Then businesses won't have the excuse that health care costs for older workers gives them good reason to lay off older workers. This commentary by Susie Madrak is at crooksandliars.com:

If this is true, this is exactly why it would be such a good idea to lower the Medicare age to 55 - because otherwise, industry paints a target on every Boomer back:

Every day there's another layoff announcement, so Sean O'Grady finds himself confused about why his Philadelphia-based recruiting company, CareerTV USA Inc., is doing so well.

"We had to shake our heads at that," he said, "because we're doing our best sales ever, and we had our best quarter at the end of 2008."

So O'Grady started asking his clients to explain why they are bothering to recruit in these times, even when, in some cases, they are cutting back on hiring.

What he learned and what he is seeing "is the layoff of the baby-boom generation. Companies are filling those holes with bright-eyed, bushy-tailed college graduates.

"They are essentially trying to hire people they can pay less and get a lot of energy and enthusiasm," said O'Grady, 26, a senior producer at CareerTV.

[...] One was Andrew Vavra, 55, of Schwenksville, an unemployed marketing project manager. He had been to a another job fair recently "and no one under 40 was there," he said. "It made me angry.

GOP AGENDA: SHAFT WORKING PEOPLE

Suddenly, to hear them tell it, Republicans are fiscal conservatives. They don't want to burden future generations with debt. They haven't had any problem since the days of Ronald Reagan in doing just that when they could pursue their wars and give tax cuts to their fat cat friends. But if a dime goes to working people it's tragic and the end of western civilization. Working people are the majority in this country, and the government should be representing our interests. This commentary by Bill Gallagher is at www.smirkingchimp.com:

The Republican Party of the 21th Century has no interest in doing anything to stop the wage inequality that chips away at the middle class. The economic "recovery" during George W. Bush's terms saw median incomes actually decline as wealth shifted to the top one percent.

Wage earning Americans are inordinately burdened with the responsibility of paying for Bush's debt while people living off investments and hedge fund managers saw their tax obligations significantly reduced. Does any sane person believe the Republicans want to upset that gravy train and change the tax codes?

If Republicans had their way, they would eliminate unions and restore despotism in the workplace, embracing the mentality that, "Hey buddy, you're lucky to have a job. If you complain you're outta here." Republicans want nothing whatsoever to do with safety and health in the workplace. The Democrats do.

We have the most expensive and inefficient health care system on earth and the Republicans are fighting to preserve the status quo. The drug companies and insurance companies profit mightily from the failed system and dump their campaign money into Republican coffers. The GOP wants to preserve Bush's privatization of many Medicare programs and Republican lawmakers still insist the government cannot negotiate prices with drug companies. How's that for a sound business practice?

The Republicans scoff at green energy and government incentives to develop and use renewable energy. They remain wed to the oil and coal companies and prefer continued dependence on imported oil and the absurd notion popularized by the intellectually challenged Sarah Palin that all we have to do to become energy independent is to "drill, drill, and drill."

Saturday, March 07, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


THE LYING, LYING CORPORATE MEDIA

The corporate media are running around like Chicken Little and squawking, "Tax increase, tax increase." They're spinning President Obama's proposals as a massive tax increase in a time of recession. What they aren't mentioning is that the majority of us are getting tax cuts. The tax increases are only on people making $200,000 and above. And the tax increases aren't draconian. They're the same rates people paid during the 1990's. This article by Jamison Foser is at www.mediamatters.org:

Last week, President Obama unveiled a budget outline that extends the Bush tax cuts for all but the top two percent of taxpayers and makes permanent a tax credit of up to $800 for low- and middle-income workers that was included in the recent stimulus package, among other tax cuts.

On the other hand, individual taxpayers with taxable income above $200,000 ($250,000 for families) per year would pay more in taxes under Obama's plan, under which the tax rates paid on income in the top brackets would revert to their levels under President Clinton in the 1990s -- from 33 and 35 percent to 36 and 39.6 percent. Slate.com's Daniel Gross estimates that for someone with $350,000 in income, this will amount to about $1,500 a year in increased taxes.

So: Obama's plan cuts taxes for the vast majority of Americans, while raising them for the small number of people who make more than $200,000.

But the media, eager to hype their bogus "war on the wealthy" storyline, have portrayed it as a tax increase.

Thursday, March 05, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


THE ONLY THING CONSERVATIVES DO WELL: WHINE

A lot of places I go, for some inexplicable reason, have Fox News on the television. Fox News should more properly be called The Republican Propaganda Network. It's just one whining story after another about President Obama's efforts to save the economy. The "ideas" of the people at Fox News and the people they support have been given too much opportunity already. We see the horrendous results. People are losing jobs, homes, savings, and hope. But right-wingers whine and whine about what victims they are. This article by Thomas Frank is at www.commondreams.org:

Capitalist self-pity was much in vogue. Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, looking tanned and groomed and yet strangely mechanical, joked that he needed to get through his speech "before federal officials come here to arrest me for practicing capitalism."

Jim Gilmore, a former governor of Virginia, moaned that the "philosophy" one encountered in the land these days was that "people who succeed and have wealth are bad people, and they're entitled to be discriminated against in the tax code."

Perhaps this was because the current economic crisis was being "overblown," as claimed Lew Uhler, who heads the National Tax Limitation Committee. The administration was trying "to create as much trouble for all of us as possible, and we're here to create trouble back, back, back!"

A little while later, Mr. Uhler lapsed into the same confused zombie cry as the tea partiers across town: "We're not going to stand around and take it anymore! We're mad as hell and we're not taking it!"

They're not going to take it anymore? I guess it's supposed to be obvious that conservatives are history's real victims -- that their imagined suffering at the hands of that Big Deficit to Come trumps the global systemic economic crisis and all the upheaval it may unleash.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


THE WEALTHY HAVE WAGED CLASS WARFARE ON US


Now that President Obama has released his first budget and the budget contains provisions for raising taxes on the rich we will hear the caterwauling from the right about "class warfare" and "redistribution of wealth." But for decades the right-wing policies pursued by our government have effectively been transferring the wealth to the richest people in this country and systematically destroying the working and middle class. We have had policies that ship jobs to other countries. The minimum wage has barely budged in comparison to the explosion in CEO salaries and perks. There has been an active effort to destroy the union movement. The rich have received massive tax breaks that in many cases mean their effective rate of taxation is lower than that of working people. I have no sympathy for these creeps. This article by Jamison Foser is at mediamatters.org:

But the real problem with Cummings' article -- and with the rest of the week's news reports about "class warfare" and "redistribution of wealth" -- is that they frame Obama's proposals in such negative terms. It's hard to think of a single example of tax or spending policy that doesn't in some way "redistribute wealth." Some redistribute wealth upward, some redistribute wealth downward. But the media only seem to break out the "class warfare" and "redistribution of wealth" pejorative when the wealth in question is heading to those who are not already wealthy.

(At this point, it should be noted that big-name political reporters earn considerably more money than most of the people who read and watch their reports. According to Sean Quinn at FiveThirtyEight.com, one reporter asked after Gibbs' briefing yesterday: "Did you notice all the questions about taxes came from reporters making over $250,000 a year, especially the TV guys?")

THE FREAKS OF THE FAR RIGHT

Sometimes when you look at the denizens of the Far Right in this country you have to wonder why they aren't in a circus sideshow somewhere next to the three-headed chicken. Their idea of "Americanism" is for a few people to have everything and everyone else to have nothing. They claim that God is on their side. They talk about "freedom" while doing everything in their power to suppress freedom. Smoke a joint and go to prison, but engineer a massive Ponzi scheme and you're paying homage to the "free market." This article by Bob Cesca is at www.huffingtonpost.com:

After nearly three decades of Reaganomics in which the wealthiest two percent have grown exponentially wealthier while middle class wages have remained stagnant, a growing faction of super rich Americans is seriously pissed off -- and their Wingnut Revolution is upon us.

Sure, the interests and influence of the wealthiest two percent make them more responsible than most for the free market policies that created this current economic crisis. But if there's one thing we've learned about those responsible for this recession, it's that the concept of accountability is about as foreign as their live-in au pairs. Instead, they're trying to pin this on Barney Frank and a legion of "losers" (read that: working class minorities) even though Ben Bernanke himself has debunked this myth.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

THE MISERIES OF JURY DUTY

Jury duty has become a plague in Fresno County. I've gotten four summons in just eight years. The last three times I got excused without having to report to the courthouse. Not this time, though.

Among the things I hate is the downtown location of the courthouse. Parking can be a nightmare. The court has free parking across from the baseball park, but if you're unfamiliar with downtown it can be a problem finding the parking lot.

Then you ride a packed shuttle to the courthouse and go into the Jury Assembly Room. You turn in one of the forms they sent you with the summons and they call roll. Then they come back with the dreaded announcement that you've been assigned to a courtroom.

You go through a metal detector. You have to empty your pockets and even take off your belt and watch. If the machine beeps, you have to go back through the process.

The elevators are packed and slower than a garden snail.

You go into the courtroom, which has absolutely no windows, and they call roll again.

The judge comes in and reads the charges against the accused. The the first eighteen names are called for people to report to jury box. They are handed a green sheet questionnaire.

The judge asks if the prospective jurors know the attorneys, witnesses, or the defendant. He asks if there are any religious or philosophical reasons someone couldn't serve on a jury. He asks about hardship jury duty would impose.

Then the defense attorney and the prosecutor start asking questions of the prospective jurors. They are looking for biases that might make an impartial verdict impossible. After that, they have challenges to people they think would be biased and they excuse those people.

You go through this process repeatedly until a jury and six alternate jurors get selected.

I would be in favor of a professional jury system. Everything else about the criminal and civil justice system is done by professionals. Judges are professionals, attorneys are professionals, and the law enforcement personnel are professionals. The biggest issue would be keeping professional jurors from becoming too chummy with judges and attorneys and becoming biased. But anyone who thinks the current system isn't already stacked against poor defendants is kidding himself.

I wrote our esteemed governor about my issues with coercive jury duty months ago and never got a reply. I also left a phone message and never got a reply, which shows what politicians think of ordinary constituents. We're just there to provide bodies to this process so they can create the illusion that justice is being served.


Sunday, February 08, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


LIMBAUGH, REPUBLICAN DEMAGOGUE


People who faithfully listen to Rush Limbaugh and spout his talking points are like mindless drones. They proudly call themselves "Ditto Heads," announcing to the world that they don't think for themselves. The irony is that the policies pushed by Limbaugh are hurtful to his devout followers. Now Limbaugh has arrogated to himself the position of leading the Republican party. Let's hope so. Most people don't care for Limbaugh and the extremism he represents. If he is the face of the Republican party, it means the even further demise of the GOP and I'm all in favor of that. This article by Faye Fiore and Mark Z. Barabak is at www.latimes.com:


Limbaugh has plenty of critics, not all of them liberal or Democrats. Some Republicans worry that the 58-year-old AM radio icon, highly effective at rallying disenchanted conservatives, may be turning off the less ideological voters whom Republicans need if they hope to again become a majority party.


"The question is: Are we going to have an all-white-man litmus test under the Republican Party? Or is there room for diverse opinion on environmental issues, on the issue of right to life, the issue of taxes and spending?" said Rich Bond, a GOP strategist and former chairman of the Republican National Committee. "There must be room for dissent in the Republican Party. It must be sincere. It must have comity."


To some, Limbaugh crossed a line when he recently rooted for Obama's downfall. Asked along with other prominent political types to write 400 words on his hopes for the president, Limbaugh said: "I don't need 400 words. I need four: I hope he fails."

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE


REPUBLICANS: THE TAX CUT IS MY SHEPHERD


Republicans, whose policies created the economic crisis we face now, are obstructing passage of a stimulus package because they want tax cuts for their fat cat friends. It's the same stuff that got us into this hole. It's almost like a religion with these clowns. You can almost see them on bended knee, looking heavenward, and reconstructing the 23rd Psalm. "The tax cut is my shepherd and I shall not want." Joe Conason talks about the reality of the stimulus package vs. the myths propagated by self-serving Republicans, who put fat cats before country. This commentary is at www.observer.com:


Another persistent myth denigrates spending on food stamps, unemployment insurance, tuition aid and similar programs as “welfare” that doesn’t promote growth. According to this argument, assistance to the poor doesn’t qualify as “stimulus” because it doesn’t create public assets such as roads or bridges. But the real purpose of fiscal stimulus is to boost demand in the economy and prevent the bottom from dropping out under prices for goods and services—in short, to forestall a deflationary spiral. Giving money to families that will purchase things immediately is the best kind of boost, as both Moody’s and the Congressional Budget Office have noted in recent studies.

It is true that we need to make real investments in transportation, energy, education and technology for the future—and that our future fiscal difficulties will be eased if we make those investments now. Yet the most immediate need is to promote demand, which will restore confidence and encourage investment.

What we ought to learn from this episode is that extreme inequality reduces national economic stability. The falling wages of working families forced them to rely too much on credit to maintain and improve their standards of living. Restoring the American dream means putting a floor under family incomes and reducing the gap between the richest and poorest, not only for the sake of simple justice but because that is the most reliable economic policy for the nation as a whole.

REALITY: MOST OF US WON'T GET RICH


Back in the days of aristocrats and peasants the peasants knew they wouldn't get rich, so I doubt they identified much with the people in the big castles. In the United States we get brainwashed into thinking that we, too, could be rich under the right circumstances. That's a part of the reason people don't rise up against the massive inequality in this country. This discussion by John Buell is at www.commondreams.org:

During the campaign, Democrats argued that working and middle-class citizens would be better off under their tax proposals. This debate is important, but it obscures one quintessentially American trait. More workers in the U.S. than in other nations are convinced they are going to become rich. They identify with the interests and ideas of the rich. It is important to reduce taxes on the working class. Nonetheless, fair taxation and economic justice are less likely as long as many believe they are only a little more hard work - or one lottery ticket - away from wealth.

Recent studies show that rags to riches stories, so widely publicized here, are actually less common than in much-reviled and more egalitarian European social democracies. Nonetheless, statistical attacks on mythology often fail to address the gut level concerns that feed it. Reformers must counter Horatio Alger tales of fortune tapping the hardworking for great wealth. Many of the largest modern fortunes are not the result of work or clever invention but insider deals that harm ordinary workers and even investors.

Hank Paulson's bailout was administered by Wall Street insiders, who showered billions of dollars on a narrow cadre of investment bankers. These banks in turn plot more mergers even as they abstain from lending to productive enterprises. The income investment bankers make from marketing exotic derivatives that destabilize the world economy is then taxed at about half the rate of plumbers' incomes. The plumber trying to start a business is paying more taxes so that investment bankers can pay less.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

HOLD BUSH AND CHENEY ACCOUNTABLE

GOP: GREED ON STEROIDS

I think of what Joseph Welch said to red-baiter Senator Joseph McCarthy: "Have you, Sir, at long last no sense of shame?" Republican policies have created the worst economic meltdown since the Great Depression (which was also caused by Republican policies) and they want to continue more of the same. If the word chutzpah ever applied to anyone, it's to this gang of thieves. Bob Herbert writes about it in this column at www.nytimes.com:

The question that I would like answered is why anyone listens to this crowd anymore. G.O.P. policies have been an absolute backbreaker for the middle class. (Forget the poor. Nobody talks about them anymore, not even the Democrats.) The G.O.P. has successfully engineered a wholesale redistribution of wealth to those already at the top of the income ladder and then, in a remarkable display of chutzpah, dared anyone to talk about class warfare.

A stark example of this unholy collaboration between the G.O.P. and the very wealthy was on display in the pages of this newspaper on Jan. 18. The Times’s Mike McIntire wrote an article about the first wave of federal bailout money for the financial industry, which was handed over by the Bush administration with hardly any strings attached. (Congress, under the control of the Democrats, should never have allowed this to happen, but the Democrats are as committed to fecklessness as the Republicans are to tax cuts.)